lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4, v14] PCI, ACPI: Physical PCI slot objects
    Alex-san, Jesse-san,

    > Note how we're checking get_slot_from_name. That should prevent
    > your scenario (b) that you describe above.
    >
    > Maybe the diff was confusing, but I am definitely not removing
    > your code. I'm simply adding on top of a86161b3134465f, and not
    > removing it.
    >

    I have to apologize. I was using v14 unintentionally on my test
    environment yesterday, while I thought I was using v15.

    I think v15 will prevent senario (b), though I have not tried it
    yet. I'll check it again.

    And I agree that Alex-san's patch go to Jesse-san's linux-next.
    If I found something after that, I'll report it or send a
    incremental patch. To tell the truth, I have several patches
    that are waiting for Alex-san's patch to be merged to linux-next:)

    >> I made a below patch to prevent (b), please take a look. And could you
    >> please consider merging it to "[PATCH 2/3] Introduce pci_slot" in your
    >> latest series.
    >
    > Ok, now this is very confusing to me. Why is this patch so
    > different from a86161b3134465f?
    >
    > Are you saying the call to get_slot_from_name() is no longer
    > sufficient?
    >

    Though I might misunderstand something about your patch, I thought
    get_slot_from_name() approach would break what your patch is trying
    to do.

    My understanding about your patch is as follows:

    (x) If multiple hotplug drivers try to register the same slot (try
    to handle the same slot, in other words), pci_hp_register()
    returns -EBUSY.

    (y) If one or more drivers try to assign the same name to multiple
    slots, pci_hp_register() returns -EEXIST.

    I thought senario (x) will return -EEXIST instead of -EBUSY if we
    use get_slot_from_name() approach. So I made a different patch.

    In addition, regardless of whether my understanding is correct or not,
    I noticed my patch I sent yesterday might be not good, because I made
    it under the misunderstanding that I thought pci_hp_register() is called
    even by ACPI pci slot driver...

    Anyway, I'll look at your patch again after having several cups of coffee.

    Thanks,
    Kenji Kaneshige



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-06-11 03:53    [W:0.048 / U:0.528 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site