Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:41:05 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: m68k libc5 regression |
| |
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:22:05 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:48:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:37:59 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > > > I shall merge this fix into my tree (y'know - the one where memory > > > > management patches are hosted) and I'll get it into 2.6.26 and shall > > > > offer it to the -stable team. This will cause me to get collisions > > > > with the duplicated patch in linux-next but fortunately it is small. > > > > This time. > > > > > > So what's the appropriate way to handle this? > > > > Well at least please reply letting people know what's happening with it. > > > > Ask me to merge it and remind me that it's needed in -stable. Or just > > send the thing to Linus and -stable immediately. > > I recall adding: > Cc: stable@kernel.org > > will automagically tell the stable team when this is > merged and that it is a -stable candidate. >
Yup. Except I always use the <> wrappers around the email address. In fact my scripts require that (and probably shouldn't). We don't seem very consistent with that.
| |