Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 May 2008 21:18:02 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: the purge :-) |
| |
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:44:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:16:08AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:04:43 -0700 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:27:15AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:27:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I've now moved my trees around a bit, and would like it if you could > > > > > include the following, in this order (the # NEXT_BASE variable is set in > > > > > them to make sure things get ordered properly.) > > > > > driver-core.next > > > > > usb.next > > > > > driver-core > > > > > usb > > > > > ldp.next > > > > > > > > > > The ".next" trees are what is going to Linus before the next major > > > > > release happens (bugfixes and new device ids at this point in time for > > > > > example.) The other trees are what is going to go to Linus after the > > > > > next major kernel is out. > > Ok, I'll go rename them to be ".current" instead of ".next"
Now done, the sequence is: driver-core.current usb.current driver-core usb ldp.next
I left ldp.next as that is really only for the -next tree.
If you have any problems with this, please let me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |