[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> and you're now done. You have your "mm_lock()" (which still needs to be
> renamed - it should be a "mmu_notifier_lock()" or something like that),
> but you don't need the insane sorting. At most you apparently need a way
> to recognize duplicates (so that you don't deadlock on yourself), which
> looks like a simple bit-per-vma.

Andrea's mm_lock could have wider impact. It is the first effective
way that I have seen of temporarily holding off reclaim from an address
space. It sure is a brute force approach.

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-08 03:15    [W:0.106 / U:25.224 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site