[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem
    On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:56:23PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > This also looks very debatable indeed. The only performance numbers quoted
    > are:
    > > This results in f.e. the Aim9 brk performance test to got down by 10-15%.
    > which just seems like a total disaster.
    > The whole series looks bad, in fact. Lack of authorship, bad single-line

    Glad you agree. Note that the fact the whole series looks bad, is
    _exactly_ why I couldn't let Christoph keep going with
    mmu-notifier-core at the very end of his patchset. I had to move it at
    the top to have a chance to get the KVM and GRU requirements merged
    in 2.6.26.

    I think the spinlock->rwsem conversion is ok under config option, as
    you can see I complained myself to various of those patches and I'll
    take care they're in a mergeable state the moment I submit them. What
    XPMEM requires are different semantics for the methods, and we never
    had to do any blocking I/O during vmtruncate before, now we have to.
    And I don't see a problem in making the conversion from
    spinlock->rwsem only if CONFIG_XPMEM=y as I doubt XPMEM works on
    anything but ia64.

    Please ignore all patches but mmu-notifier-core. I regularly forward
    _only_ mmu-notifier-core to Andrew, that's the only one that is in
    merge-ready status, everything else is just so XPMEM can test and we
    can keep discussing it to bring it in a mergeable state like
    mmu-notifier-core already is.

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-07 23:29    [W:0.019 / U:30.920 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site