Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 May 2008 13:07:25 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [git pull] x86 fixes |
| |
On Wed, 7 May 2008 15:48:18 -0400 Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2008 21:08:40 +0200 (CEST) > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > > Sorry, this should not have gone mainline. We had your patch > > > > queued (via Andrew) and it had testing failures, which we sent to > > > > you. One workaround was that build patch. When we dropped your > > > > patch we forgot to remove the workaround as well. > > > > > > > > > > Will it be removed, then? I haven't seen any explanation of its > > > benefits, and Adrian's point about not catching build failures in > > > olpc_battery is valid. > > > > Yes, it's scheduled for the next pull request. What's the state of the > > build failures of your original patch ? > > > > Thanks, > > tglx > > > They're queued up in Andrew's tree, I believe. You were also CC'd; > Message-ID: <20080504104756.3d7b6842@ephemeral>. It wasn't CC'd to > lkml, unfortunately.
These?
x86-geode-cache-results-from-geode_has_vsa2-and-uninline.patch x86-geode-define-geode_has_vsa2-even-if-config_mgeode_lx-is-not-set.patch
I have them queued up as for-git-x86. I'll send them over..
| |