Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 May 2008 15:48:18 -0400 | From | Andres Salomon <> | Subject | Re: [git pull] x86 fixes |
| |
On Wed, 7 May 2008 21:08:40 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > Sorry, this should not have gone mainline. We had your patch > > > queued (via Andrew) and it had testing failures, which we sent to > > > you. One workaround was that build patch. When we dropped your > > > patch we forgot to remove the workaround as well. > > > > > > > Will it be removed, then? I haven't seen any explanation of its > > benefits, and Adrian's point about not catching build failures in > > olpc_battery is valid. > > Yes, it's scheduled for the next pull request. What's the state of the > build failures of your original patch ? > > Thanks, > tglx
They're queued up in Andrew's tree, I believe. You were also CC'd; Message-ID: <20080504104756.3d7b6842@ephemeral>. It wasn't CC'd to lkml, unfortunately.
| |