[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Reserve huge pages for reliable MAP_PRIVATE hugetlbfs mappings
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Mel Gorman <> writes:
> > MAP_SHARED mappings on hugetlbfs reserve huge pages at mmap() time. This is
> > so that all future faults will be guaranteed to succeed. Applications are not
> > expected to use mlock() as this can result in poor NUMA placement.
> >
> > MAP_PRIVATE mappings do not reserve pages. This can result in an application
> > being SIGKILLed later if a large page is not available at fault time. This
> > makes huge pages usage very ill-advised in some cases as the unexpected
> > application failure is intolerable. Forcing potential poor placement with
> > mlock() is not a great solution either.
> >
> > This patch reserves huge pages at mmap() time for MAP_PRIVATE mappings similar
> > to what happens for MAP_SHARED mappings.
> This will break all applications that mmap more hugetlbpages than they
> actually use. How do you know these don't exist?

such applications couldn't have existed before the change which added
HugePages_Rsvd... which i admit was sometime between 2.6.11 and 2.6.18 but
from my point of view the inability to actually allocate hugepages without
trapping SIGSEGV/etc was a terrible bug introduced when HugePages_Rsvd was


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-04 07:33    [W:0.131 / U:1.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site