lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] coredump: zap_threads: comments && use while_each_thread()
No changes in fs/exec.o

The for_each_process() loop in zap_threads() is very subtle, it is not clear
why we don't race with fork/exit/exec. Add the fat comment.

Also, change the code to use while_each_thread().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- 26-rc2/fs/exec.c~3_CDUMP_COMMENTS 2008-05-26 19:37:35.000000000 +0400
+++ 26-rc2/fs/exec.c 2008-05-31 20:05:21.000000000 +0400
@@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ static void zap_process(struct task_stru
sigaddset(&t->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
signal_wake_up(t, 1);
}
- } while ((t = next_thread(t)) != start);
+ } while_each_thread(start, t);
}

static inline int zap_threads(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -1534,7 +1534,36 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct tas

if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == mm->core_waiters + 1)
goto done;
-
+ /*
+ * We should find and kill all tasks which use this mm, and we should
+ * count them correctly into mm->core_waiters. We don't take tasklist
+ * lock, but this is safe wrt:
+ *
+ * fork:
+ * None of sub-threads can fork after zap_process(leader). All
+ * processes which were created before this point should be
+ * visible to zap_threads() because copy_process() adds the new
+ * process to the tail of init_task.tasks list, and lock/unlock
+ * of ->siglock provides a memory barrier.
+ *
+ * do_exit:
+ * The caller holds mm->mmap_sem. This means that the task which
+ * uses this mm can't pass exit_mm(), so it can't exit or clear
+ * its ->mm.
+ *
+ * de_thread:
+ * It does list_replace_rcu(&leader->tasks, &current->tasks),
+ * we must see either old or new leader, this does not matter.
+ * However, it can change p->sighand, so lock_task_sighand(p)
+ * must be used. Since p->mm != NULL and we hold ->mmap_sem
+ * it can't fail.
+ *
+ * Note also that "g" can be the old leader with ->mm == NULL
+ * and already unhashed and thus removed from ->thread_group.
+ * This is OK, __unhash_process()->list_del_rcu() does not
+ * clear the ->next pointer, we will find the new leader via
+ * next_thread().
+ */
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_process(g) {
if (g == tsk->group_leader)
@@ -1544,17 +1573,13 @@ static inline int zap_threads(struct tas
do {
if (p->mm) {
if (p->mm == mm) {
- /*
- * p->sighand can't disappear, but
- * may be changed by de_thread()
- */
lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
zap_process(p);
unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
}
break;
}
- } while ((p = next_thread(p)) != g);
+ } while_each_thread(g, p);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
done:


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-31 18:17    [W:0.047 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site