[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

    You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below:

    On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Michael Kerrisk
    <> wrote:
    > Miklos,
    > I already fixed most of the isues with utimensat() in my previous
    > version of the patch several days back, and that patch (probably
    > still) applies against current mainline.
    > This is a bug. It is one of *several* bugs in the original
    > implementation of the utimensat()/futimens() interface. All of them
    > should be fixed. I have by now provided fixes for most of them. (Not
    > point 2 above, but with a little help that should be quickly fixed as
    > well.) At this point, I think you need to explain why you think those
    > fixes shouldn't be applied.


    Michael Kerrisk
    Linux man-pages maintainer;
    Found a bug?

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-30 21:47    [W:0.022 / U:20.820 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site