[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][Patch 5/5]integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider

    On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 20:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

    > > > - ima_fixup_inodes looks like it will race and crash against a
    > > > well-timed unmount. I expect you will need to bump s_count before
    > > > dropping sb_lock. See writeback_inodes() for an example.
    > >
    > > ima_fixup_inodes() is called once at initialization.
    > What is "initialisation"? During initcalls? Are there even any files
    > in cache at that time? I bet we can arrange for the answer to become
    > "no".

    Yes, during the initcalls. Is this possible even when using
    late_initcall(). IMA is dependent on the TPM being available,
    if it is being used.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-30 15:09    [W:0.019 / U:0.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site