[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [GIT PATCH] USB fixes for 2.6.26-rc4
    Hi Dave,

    Sure, I somewhat understand your concerns about the timeout change,
    but we responded to an email form you over a week ago and never
    received a reply regarding our viewpoint. It was sent to your
    personal email address as well as to the public linux-usb list.
    Please refer to the email titled "[PATCH 5/5] EHCI: fix performance
    regression" dated Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:02 PM. In that email, we
    state that it doesn't make sense to reduce the timeout to 3ms and we
    still don't have a full understanding of why increasing it to 10 ms is
    such a bad idea.

    While we had initially been discussing this bug with you over private
    emails, once we lost touch with you, we resolved it in close
    collaboration with Alan. We have spent many tens of hours working on
    this bug with Alan. We'd appreciate the ability to stay in the loop
    with any technical issues pertaining to and arising from the patch,
    and to have our concerns properly responded to.


    On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:48 PM, David Brownell <> wrote:
    > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote:
    >> USB: EHCI: fix performance regression
    > That's not a regresssion at all! Plus, this patch shouldn't
    > have included the timeout change. The timeout change is why
    > I didn't ACK this patch...
    > --
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
    > the body of a message to
    > More majordomo info at

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-30 02:17    [W:0.020 / U:15.380 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site