Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Tue, 27 May 2008 13:47:29 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 11:58 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I therefore suggest this patch to let GROUP_SCHED depend on BROKEN.
NAK - Most if not all issues have fixes or specific reverts already.
Your suggestion is really quite ridiculous and offensive to me. BROKEN is for stuff that crashes kernels or corrupts user data. Group scheduling does neither.
As I've said - and which you so 'tactfully' quoted - group scheduling is a mathmatically complex topic that we are improving actively. The feature is not enabled by default and it depends on EXPERIMENTAL.
Adrian - if you care about the subject so much - dive into the code and help us, instead of becoming an obstacle. These past years you've shown you're capable of understanding trivial C snippets, here is an opportunity to show you can do real stuff too.
FYI your attitude in the past few weeks is getting on my nerves - you act all self important but have not made a single contribution to the kernel above the level of a janitor-newbie.
| |