Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: fair group scheduler not so fair? | Date | Thu, 22 May 2008 13:18:33 -0700 | From | "Li, Tong N" <> |
| |
Peter,
I didn't look at your patches, but I thought you were flattening group weights down to task-level so that the scheduler only looks at per-task weights. That'd make group fairness as good as task fairness gets. Is this still the case?
tong
>-----Original Message----- >From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel- >owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Peter Zijlstra >Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 1:08 PM >To: Chris Friesen >Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com; mingo@elte.hu; >pj@sgi.com >Subject: Re: fair group scheduler not so fair? > >On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 14:02 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > >> I haven't really dug into the scheduler yet (although that's next), but >> based on these results it doesn't really look like the load balancer is >> properly group-aware. > >I'm trying, but its turning out to be rather more difficult than >expected. Any help here would be much appreciated. > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |