Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 May 2008 11:11:11 +0200 | From | Benoit Boissinot <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] bitreversal program |
| |
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Soumyadip Das Mahapatra wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2008, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > > Sorry to disturb you again. But i tested my code against Akinobu's one > and the test result shows my code takes less cpu time than that of > Akinobu's. > > My processor is 1.4 GHz one. > I am not forcing you to review my code( or i've no expectation of > inclusion of it ) but its just a curiousity: what is truth behind > the output.
I'm using a core duo 1.2GHz, if you want to play with the code, I'm attaching a tarball (it's hackish, just change the #include at the top of bitrev.h to switch implementation).
I'm using gcc -Wall -O3 to compile with gcc 4.2.3.
regards,
Benoit
-- :wq [unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream] | |