lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: better msleep for drivers
    Hi!

    > > Still longer term I suppose there's really no way around having accurate
    > > sleep functions and it's probably better to start testing earlier than later.
    >
    > No objections, but we should not do that with a stupid msleep
    > replacement interface; instead we should expose a flexible in kernel
    > variant of hrtimer_nanosleep() which lets the user utilize
    > ABS/REL_TIME and the different clocks. A msleep helper can be built on
    > top of this very easily.

    While you are at it... it would be cool to have

    'mdelay(2500 msec), but it is okay to wait 100msec more' -- type
    interface, so we could use that for nohz benefit.

    Currently, mdelay is 'it is okay to wait 10msec more' interface, and
    it would be nice to have that explicit.

    --
    (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
    (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

    --
    (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
    (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-21 12:45    [W:0.021 / U:89.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site