[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: git trees which are not yet in linux-next
    On Sat, 03 May 2008 03:11:25 +0200 Stefan Richter <> wrote:

    > Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > git-ieee1394: git+ssh://
    > Stephen pulls linux1394-2.6.git#for-next.
    > > Guys, could you please prepare a tree for Stephen and send the details
    > > over to him? Please Cc me also.
    > >
    > > Once this has happened, there should be no need to run a separate for-mm
    > > branch. I'll just switch over to using whatever branch linux-next is
    > > using.
    > -mm is going to become identical in content to -next?

    -mm will be (and now is)

    <other patches>

    Where "other patches" includes git trees which aren't in linux-next.

    So yes, you should drop #for-mm and add #for-next.

    I will pull your #for-next brach daily, but I'll only include it (as
    git-ieee1394.patch) if for some reason linux-next.patch needed to be

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-03 03:23    [W:0.021 / U:0.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site