[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Extend list debugging to cover hlists
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:14:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> linux-next is a better tree against which to prepare 2.6.x+1 patches.

Is there a reason to wait for 2.6.x+1? People are having problems today
with corrupt hlists.

Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-03 01:19    [W:0.067 / U:5.692 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site