Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 May 2008 17:17:27 -0600 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Extend list debugging to cover hlists |
| |
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:14:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > linux-next is a better tree against which to prepare 2.6.x+1 patches.
Is there a reason to wait for 2.6.x+1? People are having problems today with corrupt hlists.
-- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."
| |