lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Slow DOWN, please!!!
    From
    Date
    Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl> writes:
    >
    > Speaking of energy and time of a tester. I'd like to know where these resources
    > should be directed from the arch point of view. Once I had a plan to buy as
    > many arches as I could get and run a farm of test boxes 8-) But that's hard
    > because of various reasons (money, time, room, energy). What arches need more
    > attention? Which are forgotten? Which are going away? For example does buying
    > an alphaserver DS 20 (hey - it's cheap) and running tests on it makes sense
    > these days?

    A lot of bugs are not architecture specific. Or when they are architecture
    specific they only affect some specific machines in that architecture.
    But really a lot of bugs should happen on most architectures. Just focussing
    on lots of boxes is not necessarily productive.

    My recommendation would be to concentrate on deeper testing (more coverage)
    on the architectures you have.

    A interestig project for example would be to play with the kernel gcov patch that
    was recently reposted (I hope it makes mainline eventually). Apply that patch,
    run all the test suites and tests you usually run on your favourite test box
    and check how much of the code that is compiled into your kernel was really tested
    using the coverage information Then think: what additional tests can you do to get
    more coverage? Write tests then? Or just write descriptions on what is not tested
    and send them to the list, as a project for others looking to contribute to the
    kernel.

    -Andi


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-02 12:23    [W:3.363 / U:0.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site