lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: hibernate event order question
Date
On Sunday, 18 of May 2008, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, 18 of May 2008, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, 18 of May 2008, Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> > > > > Tobias Diedrich wrote:
> > > > > > > > Shouldn't there be a 'prepare for poweroff'-callback, which gets
> > > > > > > > called
> > > > > > > > before the system is powered off for real?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, it should and it's called in recent kernels.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For what values of 'recent'?
> > > > > > I'm running 2.6.26-rc2 here. :)
> > > > > > How do I hook into this callback?
> > > > > > (suspend_late maybe? Going to try that one next...)
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, this patch fixes the 'regression' introduced by the previous
> > > > > patch (at least for me ;)):
> > > >
> > > > Well, what exactly do you do to hibernate the box?
> > >
> > > |#!/bin/sh
> > > |
> > > |SYSPRINTK=/proc/sys/kernel/printk
> > > |OLDPRINTK=$(cat $SYSPRINTK)
> > > |chvt 1
> > > |# work around forcedeth wake-on-lan bug
> > > |#rmmod forcedeth
> > > |echo 9 > $SYSPRINTK
> > > |# shutdown/reboot/platform
> > > |echo shutdown > /sys/power/disk
> >
> > You don't see the devices' suspend callbacks invoked before powering off
> > because of this. Change that to 'platform' (unless that breaks things).
>
> Hmm, I think someone recommended to use shutdown since that is
> supposed to be more reliable.
> Anyway, I think the shutdown hook is good anyway since I suspect
> that if I do a normal system shutdown with promiscous mode still on,
> then wake-on-lan would also not work?
> I haven't checked that though.
> At least I think the shutdown hook won't hurt. :)

No, it won't.

> > I'm unable to comment on the device-specific things, but apart from this the
> > patch looks okay to me except for one thing.
> > > + if (np->wolenabled)
> > > + pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot);
> > > + else pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3cold);
> >
> > I'm not sure if it's possible to put the device into D3cold without actually
> > removing power from it.
>
> Ok, I've cleaned it up a bit and split it up properly (I think):
> http://www.tdiedrich.de/~ranma/patches/forcedeth/2.6.26-rc2/
> series:

Can you send those patches as a series of messages, please?

> forcedeth.resume.promisc.patch
> forcedeth.hibernate.wol.patch
> forcedeth.swappedmac.patch
> forcedeth.reorder_suspend_resume.patch

Thanks,
Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-18 14:35    [W:0.259 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site