[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
    On Thu 2008-05-15 15:03:17, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> writes:
    > > Well, it looks like we do similar things concurrently. Please have a look
    > > here:
    > Yes. Part of the reason I wanted to separate these two conversations
    > I knew something was going on.
    > > Similar patches are in the Greg's tree already.
    > Taking a look.
    > I just can't get past the fact in that the only reason hibernation can
    > not use the widely implemented and tested probe/remove is because of
    > filesystems on block devices, and that you are proposing to add 4
    > methods for each and every driver to handle that case, when they
    > don't need ANYTHING!
    > I wonder how hard teaching the upper layers to deal with
    > hotplug/remove is?

    It looked _too_ hard when I was looking... at least if we are thinking
    off "keep the filesystem mounted over unplug-replug".

    Or do you have something else in mind?
    (cesky, pictures)

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-16 14:19    [W:0.019 / U:33.460 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site