[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
On Thu 2008-05-15 15:03:17, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> writes:
> > Well, it looks like we do similar things concurrently. Please have a look
> > here:
> Yes. Part of the reason I wanted to separate these two conversations
> I knew something was going on.
> > Similar patches are in the Greg's tree already.
> Taking a look.
> I just can't get past the fact in that the only reason hibernation can
> not use the widely implemented and tested probe/remove is because of
> filesystems on block devices, and that you are proposing to add 4
> methods for each and every driver to handle that case, when they
> don't need ANYTHING!
> I wonder how hard teaching the upper layers to deal with
> hotplug/remove is?

It looked _too_ hard when I was looking... at least if we are thinking
off "keep the filesystem mounted over unplug-replug".

Or do you have something else in mind?
(cesky, pictures)

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-16 14:19    [W:0.056 / U:14.312 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site