lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree
> > So you just stick unlock_kernel()/lock_kernel() around the call
> > to TTY (or similar to the entry points)
> >
>
> ... assuming that the ISDN code doesn't assume lock continuity across
> the TTY call.

And procfs and between the tty and the net config code and ...

Keeping the BKL just in legacy places doesn't work. A counting mutex (ie
one you can self multi-lock) might be very useful to fix some of these
however as once we push it down to the point of being a driver specific
lock we can just give it a driver mutex


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-14 23:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans