[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] common implementation of iterative div/mod
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> You would need to annotate it and have a separate object file for the
>>> different sections. Also it would need to be compiled PIC.
>>> Inlining is better.
>> BTW, I'm seeing the memcpy() in __vdso_gettimeofday() not being inlined.
> Hmm works here. What compiler do you use? Normally gcc should
> recognize the memcpy is just two constant stores and always inline even with -Os.

jeremy@cosworth:~/hg/xen/paravirt/linux-x86_64$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux/3.4.4/specs
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr
--libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.4
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls
--without-included-gettext --program-suffix=-3.4 --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk
--disable-werror x86_64-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)

I think this is still a supported compiler, isn't it?


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-14 12:55    [W:0.076 / U:9.388 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site