[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] common implementation of iterative div/mod
    Andi Kleen wrote:
    > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
    >> Andi Kleen wrote:
    >>> You would need to annotate it and have a separate object file for the
    >>> different sections. Also it would need to be compiled PIC.
    >>> Inlining is better.
    >> BTW, I'm seeing the memcpy() in __vdso_gettimeofday() not being inlined.
    > Hmm works here. What compiler do you use? Normally gcc should
    > recognize the memcpy is just two constant stores and always inline even with -Os.

    jeremy@cosworth:~/hg/xen/paravirt/linux-x86_64$ gcc -v
    Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux/3.4.4/specs
    Configured with: ../src/configure -v
    --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,pascal,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr
    --libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.4
    --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls
    --without-included-gettext --program-suffix=-3.4 --enable-__cxa_atexit
    --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=mt --enable-clocale=gnu
    --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk
    --disable-werror x86_64-linux
    Thread model: posix
    gcc version 3.4.4 20050314 (prerelease) (Debian 3.4.3-13)

    I think this is still a supported compiler, isn't it?


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-14 12:55    [W:0.020 / U:6.316 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site