lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: git trees which are not yet in linux-next
Hi Pierre,

On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:45 +0200 Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx> wrote:
>
> That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for
> for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary.

What it allows me to do, though, is drop your "next" tree if things go
really bad without dropping fixes for Linus' current tree that you deem
necessary.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-05-13 14:37    [W:0.052 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site