lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 21/21] slab defrag: Obsolete SLAB
    On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:38 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
    <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
    > > > What about the TPC performance regressions? My understanding was that
    > > > slub still performed worse in the "object allocated on one CPU, freed on
    > > > the other CPU" type workloads due to less batching.
    > >
    > > Which can be the majority of object allocations and frees in some
    > > workloads. It definately wants fixing.
    >
    > Agreed, that situation is very frequency happend, IMHO.

    Christoph fixed a tbench regression that was in the same ballpark as
    the TPC regression reported by Matthew which is why we've asked the
    Intel folks to re-test. But yeah, we're working on it.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-05-12 09:57    [W:4.170 / U:1.372 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site