Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 May 2008 17:15:20 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10586] New: High Number of Segfaults onMacBookStarting With 2.6.24.5 Kernel |
| |
On Thu, 01 May 2008 16:56:18 -0700 Ryan Roth <ryanroth@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: proc_dir_entry 'info' already registered > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: Pid: 1099, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.25-git16 #3 > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: Call Trace: > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff81118269>] idr_get_new+0xb/0x28 > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff810d5e92>] proc_register+0xcb/0x14b > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff810d5ec5>] proc_register+0xfe/0x14b > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff810d5f96>] proc_create_data+0x84/0x9e > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffffa013dd37>] > > :video:acpi_video_bus_add+0x98f/0xc6d > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff8115d4d9>] acpi_device_probe+0x43/0x91 > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff81192564>] driver_probe_device+0xd0/0x14d > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff81192627>] __driver_attach+0x46/0x6d > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff811925e1>] __driver_attach+0x0/0x6d > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff81191f09>] bus_for_each_dev+0x44/0x6f > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff8119186e>] bus_add_driver+0xb2/0x1ff > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff81192846>] driver_register+0x59/0xcd > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffffa00d803c>] :video:acpi_video_init+0x3c/0x5e > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff81052db2>] sys_init_module+0x171a/0x1896 > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff8115d812>] acpi_bus_register_driver+0x0/0x3e > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff81098831>] vfs_read+0xa6/0xfe > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: [<ffffffff8100bf3b>] > > system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
That's an acpi video problem - it won't be the cause of this regression. I'll forward it separately.
> > --- > > ~Randy > > > > > The segfaults are still present causing apps to not work. I attached a > boot log in case it was needed for more details. Should I not worry > about the following message? > > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base f0000000 segment > 0 buses 0 - 255 > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: PCI: BIOS Bug: MCFG area at f0000000 is not > reserved in ACPI motherboard resources > May 1 16:15:01 kernel: PCI: Not using MMCONFIG.
Again, the mmconfig warnings will be unrelated to this bug.
| |