Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 May 2008 08:47:16 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [TOMOYO #8 (2.6.25-mm1) 1/7] Introduce new LSM hooks. |
| |
* Tetsuo Handa (penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp) wrote: > The MAY_WRITE flag is not passed to security_inode_permission() > if security_inode_permission() is called from __open_namei_create(). > Since TOMOYO Linux doesn't check MAY_READ/MAY_WRITE permissions for individual > read()/write() requests, the permission checks at open() time (i.e. may_open()) > is the only chance to check MAY_WRITE flag. If I can't check MAY_WRITE flag > here, TOMOYO Linux can't control open(O_WRONLY | O_CREATE | O_EXCL). > > Also, the O_TRUNC flag is not passed to security_inode_permission() because > vfs_permission() receives only MAY_READ/MAY_WRITE/MAY_APPEND flags, but > I have to check O_TRUNC flag before do_truncate(). > > So, I inserted a new hook here so that this hook can check all > MAY_READ/MAY_WRITE/O_APPEND/O_TRUNC flags together in a single place.
The reason I ask is because it doesn't check. It only checks O_APPEND, but that's already passed in (MAY_APPEND). So AFAICT, it's only O_TRUNC that you are trying to special case. But in that case...all that is being asked for is MAY_WRITE permission. Anything else doesn't make sense, especially since that's all you get from the truncate(2) path.
<snip> > This is an inevitable duplication since I want to do conventional checks > (DAC checks and inode operation existence checks) before TOMOYO Linux's check. > > By the way, Stephen Smalley thinks it is better to copy codes which is needed by > pre_vfs_*() (i.e. may_create()/may_delete()/check_sticky()) into > security/tomoyo/ directory and leave vfs_*() untouched rather than > extract pre_vfs_*() from vfs_*() and call pre_vfs_*() from vfs_*().
I'm not sure he means literally copy. Typically we take existing functionality and make it externally usable.
Also, all the changes you make that are not in vfs_* helpers won't get picked up by NFS.
thanks, -chris
| |