[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Ok, so the most flexible solution that I see, that should fit for both
> x86 and x86_64 would be :
> 1 byte : "=q" : "a", "b", "c", or "d" register for the i386. For
> x86-64 it is equivalent to "r" class (for 8-bit
> instructions that do not use upper halves).
> 2, 4, 8 bytes : "=r" : A register operand is allowed provided that it is in a
> general register.

Any reason to keep carrying this completely misleading comment chunk still?


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-09 20:19    [W:0.208 / U:3.828 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site