[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
    Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
    > Ok, so the most flexible solution that I see, that should fit for both
    > x86 and x86_64 would be :
    > 1 byte : "=q" : "a", "b", "c", or "d" register for the i386. For
    > x86-64 it is equivalent to "r" class (for 8-bit
    > instructions that do not use upper halves).
    > 2, 4, 8 bytes : "=r" : A register operand is allowed provided that it is in a
    > general register.

    Any reason to keep carrying this completely misleading comment chunk still?


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-09 20:19    [W:0.026 / U:12.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site