[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
    On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:12:29PM -0400, Dan Noe wrote:
    > It would be nice if lspci could display what driver had claimed a
    > particular device

    You need to upgrade to a more recent version of lspci -- it already does
    this ;-)

    Maybe 'status' would be a better name than 'broken'. We could even
    default it to 'unclaimed' then. Or 'driver_status' to avoid conflicting
    with some bus that might have a 'status' bit we try to report through

    Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
    "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
    operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
    a retrograde step."

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-08 22:23    [W:0.018 / U:26.692 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site