Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: TUNER_TDA8290=y, VIDEO_DEV=n build error | Date | Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:59:17 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday, 6 of April 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 11:37:40AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 4 of April 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:20:32AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > The following report is on the current list of known regressions > > > > from 2.6.24. Please verify if the issue is still present in the > > > > mainline. > > > > > > When you asked me just 2 days ago exactly the same question in the > > > Bugzilla entry I immediately confirmed it's still present. > > > > > > Was anything wrong with my answer (and the subsequent discussions) that > > > you now also ask Toralf for confirmation? > > > > This text is automatically added to the messages sent in replies to the main > > report. > > > > Well, it probably could be better. I'm open for suggestions. :-) > > First of all you try to get the tracking of all bugs into Bugzilla, and > now you've sent a batch of emails where the answers will not get into > Bugzilla automatically.
So?
> As an example, for the bug we are talking about the main value of you > asking me in Bugzilla was not that I confirmed it's still present, the > main value was that this caused Mauro to make a fix. What would have > happened if Toralf had answered in an email that the bug is still > present?
Most probably, I would add a reference to his reply to the bugzilla entry.
> And especially for trickier stuff like suspend/resume problems it might > also make sense to send the email to all people who might possibly be > involved with the bug - even if this means putting all email addresses > from 5 MAINTAINERS entries into one email. It takes a bit more time when > writing the emails, but my experience was it's worth it.
Yes, I'm going to do that in the future.
Thanks, Rafael
| |