[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] checkpatch: relax spacing and line length
On Apr. 06, 2008, 8:18 +0300, Andrew Morton <> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 06:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt <> wrote:
>> We all had the arguments about 80 columns, so here goes a relax.
>> Checking for 95 (or perhaps something better?), but of course we
>> print "80" in the output, because if you happened to get to 95, it's
>> "really time" to break it.
> This will reduce the usefulness of checkpatch for those developers who
> choose to observe an 80-column limit.
>> This also relaxes the tab doctrine, because spaces DO make sense --
>> especially when you view the code with a tab setting of not-8.
> Non-tab-using code inevitably ends up having a mix of tabs and non-tabs
> and looks a mess if tabstops are set to anything other than eight.

I humbly disagree. If you use tabs for (logical) indentation and then trailing
spaces for (graphical) alignment, not just a random mix of tabs and spaces the
code looks fine with 8-character wide tabs or any other setup. Only when you
use tabs for graphical alignment, below fixed-width characters on the line above
you marry yourself with a specific tab expansion width.


> God I wish I had not been cc'ed on this.

The idea is *not* to open the flood gates, just to allow for a bit more
flexibility to accommodate for a more robust indentation style.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at
> Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-06 13:55    [W:0.113 / U:2.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site