[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v8)
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Balbir Singh <> wrote:
>> >> It's easier to set it up that way. Usually the end user gets the same SLA for
>> >> memory, CPU and other resources, so it makes sense to bind the controllers together.
>> >>
>> >
>> > True - but in that case why wouldn't they have the same SLA for
>> > virtual address space too?
>> >
>> Yes, mostly. That's why I had made the virtual address space patches as a config
>> option on top of the memory controller :)
> *If* they want to use the virtual address space controller, that is.
> By that argument, you should make the memory and cpu controllers the
> same controller, since in your scenario they'll usually be used
> together..

Heh, Virtual address and memory are more closely interlinked than CPU and Memory.
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-06 08:35    [W:0.184 / U:7.424 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site