[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23
    Hugh Dickins wrote:
    > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ross Biro wrote:
    >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Balbir Singh
    >> <> wrote:
    >>> Hmm.. strange.. I don't remember the overhead being so bad (I'll
    >>> relook at my old numbers). I'll try and git-bisect this one
    >> I'm checking 2.6.24 now. A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa
    >> showed no real change.
    > Worth checking 2.6.24, yes. But you've already made it clear that
    > you do NOT have mem cgroups in your 2.6.25-rc9, so Balbir (probably)
    > need not worry about your regression: my guess was wrong on that.

    Aah.. Yes... but I am definitely interested in figuring out the root cause for
    the regression.

    Warm Regards,
    Balbir Singh
    Linux Technology Center

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-29 18:49    [W:0.020 / U:91.856 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site