[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ross Biro wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Balbir Singh
>> <> wrote:
>>> Hmm.. strange.. I don't remember the overhead being so bad (I'll
>>> relook at my old numbers). I'll try and git-bisect this one
>> I'm checking 2.6.24 now. A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa
>> showed no real change.
> Worth checking 2.6.24, yes. But you've already made it clear that
> you do NOT have mem cgroups in your 2.6.25-rc9, so Balbir (probably)
> need not worry about your regression: my guess was wrong on that.

Aah.. Yes... but I am definitely interested in figuring out the root cause for
the regression.

Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-29 18:49    [W:0.044 / U:8.176 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site