Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:13:57 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: x86: fix a couple of sparse warnings |
| |
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:56:08PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:01:56PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:43:25PM +0400, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: > > > > 2008/4/28 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>: > > > > > > > > > > /me wonders what was wrong with http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/23/131 > > > > > that contains a superset of the first patch > > > > > (and got no response at all) > > > > > > > > Adrian, I am sorry for duplicating your work. The clash wasn't > > > > intentional: I did not notice your earlier patch in the high traffic > > > > of this mailing list. > > > > > > No problem, and I'm actually more interested why my patch got lost. > > > > It's simple: in this case i had two patches in my backlog, one from a > > new person and one from a frequent contributor - doing the very same > > change. I preferred the newbie's patch, to encourage Dmitri to keep > > contributing to Linux and to help him learn from the experience of > > working with various Linux maintainers. > >... > > Every maintainer except you will teach the newbie where to find the > current tree to avoid duplicating work... I have seen Ingo referring to his README file countless number of times which describes where to locate the x86.git tree and how to pull it. So has you.
Sam
| |