lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: microblaze syscall list
> There is two opinions:
> * One is take syscall table with old syscalls for backward compatibility.
> As John W wrote. Microblaze has history around 4 years and 2.6 kernel almost 2
> years.

I would keep the old syscall table. Otherwise you end up with two
differing microblaze setups and people will get binaries, libraries and
compilers muddled up for years to come which will be nothing but pain for
eveyone.
Alan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-27 19:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans