lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: microblaze syscall list
    > There is two opinions:
    > * One is take syscall table with old syscalls for backward compatibility.
    > As John W wrote. Microblaze has history around 4 years and 2.6 kernel almost 2
    > years.

    I would keep the old syscall table. Otherwise you end up with two
    differing microblaze setups and people will get binaries, libraries and
    compilers muddled up for years to come which will be nothing but pain for
    eveyone.

    Alan


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-27 19:03    [W:0.038 / U:58.752 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site