[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: microblaze syscall list
> There is two opinions:
> * One is take syscall table with old syscalls for backward compatibility.
> As John W wrote. Microblaze has history around 4 years and 2.6 kernel almost 2
> years.

I would keep the old syscall table. Otherwise you end up with two
differing microblaze setups and people will get binaries, libraries and
compilers muddled up for years to come which will be nothing but pain for


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-27 19:03    [W:0.120 / U:26.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site