Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:32:28 +0200 (CEST) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Subject | Re: [microblaze-uclinux] Re: microblaze syscall list |
| |
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:36:35PM +1000, John Williams wrote: > > Please remember that MicroBlaze has been around as an arch for > 4 > > years, just not in the kernel.org tree. These older style syscall > > interfaces are all part of the uClibc and glibc ports for MicroBlaze. > > So is it fair to say that you now understand this was the Wrong Way To > Do Things, and if anyone asks, you'd recommend getting an arch merged > into kernel.org sooner rather than later?
It's also an indicator we should have an asm-generic/unistd.h ASAP (as Arnd suggested), to make sure future archs don't make the same mistake over and over again.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |