[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: x86: 4kstacks default
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> What actually brings bad reputation is shipping a 4k option that is
>> known to break under some circumstances.
> How about making 4k stacks incompatible with those circumstances then?
> I.e. is you select 4k stacks, then you can't select XFS because we know
> that _may_ fail. Similiar for ndiswrapper networking, and other
> stuff where problems have been noticed.

Problem is, it's the storage configuration (at administration time, not
kernel build time) that matters, too.

I have XFS on Fedora with 4k stacks on SATA /dev/sdb1 on my x86 mythbox,
and it's perfectly fine. But that's a nice, simple setup. If I stacked
more things over/under it, I'd be more likely to have trouble.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-24 17:49    [W:0.226 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site