Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:11:42 -0600 | From | "Gregory Haskins" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratableones |
| |
>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 8:58 AM, in message <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804230854210.23815@gandalf.stny.rr.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> > I'm not giving an Ack on this patch (not yet). My main concern here is > that this is performing on a verge of policy change. As you stated, this > is a known issue. One that can be avoided by giving RT tasks different > priorities. It is known that two tasks with the same priority fighting > for the same CPUS (even if one is migratable and one is not) has > non-deterministic behaviour. > > This patch needs a bit of running through the grind to see what effects it > has before going in.
Perfectly reasonable stance, Steve. Thanks for the review!
-Greg
| |