Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:15:40 +0300 (EEST) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clocklib: generic clocks framework | From | Hiroshi DOYU <> |
| |
Hi Dmitry,
From: "ext Dmitry" <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clocklib: generic clocks framework Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:48:24 +0400
> > - Hiroshi DOYU has proposed an alternate debugfs implementation for the > > Linux-OMAP clock tree. I prefer it to yours, as it implements each > > clock as a separate dentry, which makes it easy to implement additional > > debugging functions, such as set_rate/set_parent/round_rate debugging. > > Perhaps you'd consider it, or something similar to it, instead? It is > > proposed here: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg00751.html > > I'll look at this. However, if we are going to use such > implementation, may we should > move instead to sysfs?
This has been discussed within the above thread in omap and you can find the sysfs implementation sysfs at the bottom of the following:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg00696.html
Hiroshi DOYU
|  |