Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:36:21 -0400 | From | Dmitry Torokhov <> | Subject | Re: HID bus |
| |
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Anssi Hannula wrote: > > > Why not just do something like > > > > #define HID_DEVICE(vend, dev) \ > > .match_flags = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE | \ > > USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_CLASS, \ > > .idVendor = (vend), \ > > .idProduct = (prod), \ > > .bInterfaceClass = USB_INTERFACE_CLASS_HID > > (see linux/usb.h) > > > > and use USB hotplugging? > > Or do we plan to match against something else as well, such as hid > > reports or something? > > No, we plan to do matching based solely on VID/PID. The report-specific > stuff is then handled between the specific driver and HID generic code. >
Hmm, [ab]using USB modalias makes me a bit uneasy. What about bluetooth HID devices?
-- Dmitry
| |