[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: x86: 4kstacks default
Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:48:45 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <> wrote:
>> We don't have effective physical address based reclaim yet for higher order allocs.
> Lumpy reclaim is supposed to be exactly that.

Also if order 1 allocs were a significant problem on i386 we must have
had lots of reports of EAGAIN on fork/clone with !4k stack kernels. I'm
not aware of an significant number of such reports (there were a few
occasionally, but that is probably normal and unavoidable and can
be caused by other things too like simply running out of lowmem)


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-20 23:55    [W:0.157 / U:8.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site