Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:41:07 +1000 | From | Reuben Farrelly <> | Subject | Re: StackProtector Oopses - Re: 2.6.25-mm1 |
| |
On 18/04/2008 11:51 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:36:45 +0200 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > >> * Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@reub.net> wrote: >> >>> is enough to prevent my system booting, viz: >> hm, does it boot up fine with the attached patch and stackprotector >> enabled? It appears that your system got to the self-test so >> stackprotector is working mostly - it's just that the self-test went >> wrong. >> > > yes it'll be interesting to see if this is due to the test triggering or due to > something else. > > Reuben: > I assume your gcc is pretty vanilla and doesn't have weird patches in this area?
I think so. Well, put it this way... I haven't made any changes to it, this is the standard/current gcc that has been in Gentoo Portage for the last while.
> Can you do a (with the test enabled in the config/code) do a > make kernel/panic.s > and send me that file? (this allows me to see what code your gcc generated for the test)
Done - posted up in the web directory along with the other files (saves the possible grief of MUA mangling).
I'm about to reboot to try Ingo's test also.
Reuben
| |