Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Apr 2008 04:28:15 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 |
| |
> I'm not complaining about anything. Who has? > > As the filesystem is for occasional, non-performance-sensitive use > by a very small number of people, doing it via FUSE sounds like an > all-round more practical approach. This has nothing to do with quality of > implementation at all.
It's a stupid idea. Moving a simple block based filesystem means it's more complicated, less efficient because of the additional context switches and harder to use because you need additional userspace packages and need to setup fuse.
We made writing block based filesystems trivial in the kernel to grow more support for filesystems like this one.
| |