lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors
    From
    From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:02:35 +0200

    > On 11/04/2008, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
    > > From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
    > > Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:09:11 +0200
    > >
    > > What people don't get is that this is a situation where the "end node
    > > principle" applies. When you have limited resources (here:
    > > developers) you don't push the bulk of the burdon upon them. Instead
    > > you push things out to the resource you have a lot of, the end nodes
    > > (here: users), so that the situation actually scales.
    > >
    > Again I can''t do anything but agree with you. You are right. When
    > it's possible to do the work this way everyone wins.
    > I was just trying to say that when it can't be done that way or the
    > user won't, then the bug report still has value and still deserves to
    > be taken seriously (although it probably goes lower in the pile than
    > the bugs where the end users actually do bisect or whatever).

    Absolutely. If, for example, someone has a clean OOPS I usually won't
    request a bisect, that's stupid.

    However if the OOPS is hard to diagnose, a bisect might be necessary
    still.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-11 01:09    [W:0.021 / U:60.248 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site