lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)
On Tue, 1 April 2008 12:46:12 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Jörn Engel wrote:
> >Write-back of data: currently not.
>
> Taking into account this, bad block handling and other stuff I kindly ask
> you
> not to do these "tricky" things like comparing amount of code lines.
> I believe if you implement all the things, you'll have _way_ more code. I
> believe you'll even have to re-design many things because write-back really
> affects the design a lot. Let's be fair.

Take those numbers with as much salt as you like. Implementing
write-back caching for metadata actually reduced the line count by 100
or so. And it did affect the design a lot, I agree.

Jörn

--
The wise man seeks everything in himself; the ignorant man tries to get
everything from somebody else.
-- unknown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-01 13:19    [W:0.073 / U:24.996 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site