[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RELEASE BLOCKER: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag
On 3/6/08, Jack Lloyd <> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 07:13:20PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > A process can send a signal via kill. IOW, a malicious process can
> > *control when the process would be interrupted* in order to get it into
> > the signal handler with DF=1.
> If the malicious process can send a signal to another process, it
> could also ptrace() it. Which is more useful, if you wanted to be
> malicious?

And more to the point, it can happen before GCC 4.3.0. So why does
GCC have do something that just happens more often now? I still don't
see why we have to work around a bug in the kernel which could show up
before GCC 4.3.0.

-- Pinski

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-06 19:39    [W:0.090 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site