lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [linux-pm] [PATCH] cpuidle: avoid singing capacitors
    On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:29:18 +0100
    Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:

    > > So for now, I'm back to thinking that measuring the interval between deep sleeps is the better approach. I could use some ideas for a good clock source though. I haven't dug much deeper than jiffies when it comes to kernel timekeeping.
    >
    > jiffies should work, you just need to make sure you measure them at the
    > right place. In particular there is some code in dyntick that catches
    > up on jiffies after the deep sleep when the normal timer handler didn't run
    > and jiffies are only usable again after that code executed.
    >

    And how can I tell if this handler has run? Not that it really matters I guess, as I don't think running it from the cpuidle governor is very sane.

    --
    -- Pierre Ossman

    Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
    PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
    rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-03-04 18:35    [W:0.020 / U:216.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site