lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: gettimeofday() jumping into the future
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Tim Ricketts wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Michael Smith wrote:
>
> > We've been seeing some strange behaviour on some of our applications
> > recently. I've tracked this down to gettimeofday() returning spurious
> > values occasionally.
> >
> > Specifically, gettimeofday() will suddenly, for a single call, return
> > a value about 4398 seconds (~1 hour 13 minutes) in the future. The
> > following call goes back to a normal value.
>
> I have also seen this.
>
> > This seems to be occurring when the clock source goes slightly
> > backwards for a single call. In
> > kernel/time/timekeeping.c:__get_nsec_offset(), we have this:
> > cycle_delta = (cycle_now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> >
> > So a small decrease in time here will (this is all unsigned
> > arithmetic) give us a very large cycle_delta. cyc2ns() then multiplies
> > this by some value, then right shifts by 22. The resulting value (in
> > nanoseconds) is approximately 4398 seconds; this gets added on to the
> > xtime value, giving us our jump into the future. The next call to
> > gettimeofday() returns to normal as we don't have this huge nanosecond
> > offset.
>
> Indeed. I don't know where the suggestion of off by 2^32us came in
> later in this thread. As you've already pointed out, it's off by
> 2^42ns.
>
> I've no idea why the TSC might go backwards, but perhaps we should not
> break horribly if it does. How about treating it as zero?

> + if (cycle_now < clock->cycle_last)
> + return 0;
> +

No, this breaks wrapping clocksources e.g. pmtimer. We need a
different sanity check for that TSC crap.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-03-31 10:59    [W:0.204 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site