Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:36:40 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: The never ending BEEEEP/__smp_call_function_mask with 2.6.25-rc7 |
| |
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Chr wrote: > > > it's "hpet" (in both cases...) > > > > Hmm. That should be stable. Which clock is jumping back and forth ? > > The one in the logs or the system clock ? > The one in the logs... (but it's because of the TSC, right?)
Yes. I thought this was fixed already in Linus tree, but I might be wrong as usual.
Anyway, that's not the real problem; I read your original post in meantime :)
> Ever since I went to the new 2.6.25-rcX ...
Did this problem start with 25-rc1 ? What is the latest version you tried ?
> [ 5215.101875] [<ffffffff80217d8f>] __smp_call_function_mask+0x90/0xc5 > [ 5215.108493] [<ffffffff8029b433>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x42 > [ 5215.114422] [<ffffffff8029b433>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x42 > [ 5215.120348] [<ffffffff8029b433>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x42 > [ 5215.126276] [<ffffffff80217e0d>] smp_call_function_mask+0x49/0x61 > [ 5215.132723] [<ffffffff8029b433>] invalidate_bh_lru+0x0/0x42 > [ 5215.138649] [<ffffffff802339a3>] on_each_cpu+0x10/0x2c > [ 5215.144135] [<ffffffff8029fb4b>] kill_bdev+0x1e/0x33 > [ 5215.149456] [<ffffffff802a01da>] __blkdev_put+0x4f/0x128 > [ 5215.155124] [<ffffffff8027dd93>] __fput+0xa1/0x164 > [ 5215.160272] [<ffffffff8027b67d>] filp_close+0x5d/0x65 > [ 5215.165679] [<ffffffff80231072>] put_files_struct+0x66/0xc4 > [ 5215.171607] [<ffffffff802323ea>] do_exit+0x245/0x64c > [ 5215.176925] [<ffffffff80238b94>] __dequeue_signal+0xff/0x159 > [ 5215.182941] [<ffffffff80232867>] do_group_exit+0x76/0x93 > [ 5215.188606] [<ffffffff8023a0fd>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x2b9/0x2e5 > [ 5215.195141] [<ffffffff8020a466>] do_notify_resume+0xaf/0x7e0 > [ 5215.201155] [<ffffffff80291414>] mntput_no_expire+0x1f/0x86 > [ 5215.201155] [<ffffffff80291414>] mntput_no_expire+0x1f/0x86
You mentioned that you have tons of other logs. Can you please upload those to some place? If you don't have a possiblity, please contact me private and I'll provide you one.
Thanks,
tglx
| |