Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Mar 2008 06:20:07 +0000 | From | Al Viro <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add C99-style constructor macros for specific-sized integers |
| |
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:43:22PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>+#define S64_C(x) x ## LL > >>+#define U64_C(x) x ## ULL > > > >but can't we use the latter for all arches? > > > > You really don't want to, as the whole point is that you want it to > match what u64/s64 is defined as, in order to avoid spurious warnings.
Excuse me, in which contexts? Where does replacement of explicitly long constant with explicitly long long one generate warnings on a host that has range(long) equal to range(long long)?
| |